-
Reconstructing Iraq: A test case for Trumpian burden-sharing
President Trump’s red line on spending U.S. public funds for Iraqi reconstruction is a high-stakes wager.
-
Diplomacy, sanctions, missile defense: Use this triad against North Korea
The U.S. must use all of its tools effectively to protect the country and its allies from North Korea’s ballistic missiles.
-
Russia’s resurgent Navy demands a coherent response, not wishful thinking
There must be a a clear-eyed understanding of the dynamic threat from Russia and a steady, meaningful commitment to protecting the world’s open maritime domain.
-
So you think you want a grand military parade?
It is easy enough as an American to witness such a spectacle and wonder why the U.S. military does not parade like the Russians do. In four years of witnessing these parades in Moscow, I have concluded that it is only something that a government that feels politically or militarily insecure would do.
-
Here’s where defense companies are funneling newfound tax dollars
If you listened to the annual earnings calls of the major, public defense companies (wait, does everyone not do that?), then you might have noticed a common theme. They’re all going to have more cash. And a lot of them have similar plans for how to spend it.
-
The US Nuclear Posture Review does not carry Trump’s signature
The Nuclear Posture Review neither proposes to leave the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty nor halt the testing moratorium. It did not propose a quantitative expansion of the nuclear arsenal either. Very un-Trump.
-
Putting the Asian fighter market in perspective
Regional tensions, historical grievances, superpower rivalries, and ongoing territorial and resource access disputes all motivate Asian air services to bolster their air power capabilities.
-
Inside DoD, the customer is speaking loudly
At its core, the dramatic increase in workarounds at DoD of the traditional acquisition process is a sure sign of growing customer unhappiness and frustration.
-
Nuclear Posture Review: Recognizing the return to great power competition
The recently-released Nuclear Posture Review reflects the central conclusion of the broader National Defense Strategy released in January: the U.S. must recognize the reality of a return to great power competition and posture itself accordingly.
-
Air mobility: A clear need for future environments
In any future environment, a robust mobility capability will be required; the versatility it offers as an instrument of national power is foundational to military, diplomatic and even economic success.
-
Reconstructing Iraq: A test case for Trumpian burden-sharing
President Trump’s red line on spending U.S. public funds for Iraqi reconstruction is a high-stakes wager.
-
Diplomacy, sanctions, missile defense: Use this triad against North Korea
The U.S. must use all of its tools effectively to protect the country and its allies from North Korea’s ballistic missiles.
-
Russia’s resurgent Navy demands a coherent response, not wishful thinking
There must be a a clear-eyed understanding of the dynamic threat from Russia and a steady, meaningful commitment to protecting the world’s open maritime domain.
-
So you think you want a grand military parade?
It is easy enough as an American to witness such a spectacle and wonder why the U.S. military does not parade like the Russians do. In four years of witnessing these parades in Moscow, I have concluded that it is only something that a government that feels politically or militarily insecure would do.
-
Here’s where defense companies are funneling newfound tax dollars
If you listened to the annual earnings calls of the major, public defense companies (wait, does everyone not do that?), then you might have noticed a common theme. They’re all going to have more cash. And a lot of them have similar plans for how to spend it.
-
The US Nuclear Posture Review does not carry Trump’s signature
The Nuclear Posture Review neither proposes to leave the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty nor halt the testing moratorium. It did not propose a quantitative expansion of the nuclear arsenal either. Very un-Trump.
-
Putting the Asian fighter market in perspective
Regional tensions, historical grievances, superpower rivalries, and ongoing territorial and resource access disputes all motivate Asian air services to bolster their air power capabilities.
-
Inside DoD, the customer is speaking loudly
At its core, the dramatic increase in workarounds at DoD of the traditional acquisition process is a sure sign of growing customer unhappiness and frustration.
-
Nuclear Posture Review: Recognizing the return to great power competition
The recently-released Nuclear Posture Review reflects the central conclusion of the broader National Defense Strategy released in January: the U.S. must recognize the reality of a return to great power competition and posture itself accordingly.
-
Air mobility: A clear need for future environments
In any future environment, a robust mobility capability will be required; the versatility it offers as an instrument of national power is foundational to military, diplomatic and even economic success.
-
Reconstructing Iraq: A test case for Trumpian burden-sharing
President Trump’s red line on spending U.S. public funds for Iraqi reconstruction is a high-stakes wager.
-
Diplomacy, sanctions, missile defense: Use this triad against North Korea
The U.S. must use all of its tools effectively to protect the country and its allies from North Korea’s ballistic missiles.
-
Russia’s resurgent Navy demands a coherent response, not wishful thinking
There must be a a clear-eyed understanding of the dynamic threat from Russia and a steady, meaningful commitment to protecting the world’s open maritime domain.
-
So you think you want a grand military parade?
It is easy enough as an American to witness such a spectacle and wonder why the U.S. military does not parade like the Russians do. In four years of witnessing these parades in Moscow, I have concluded that it is only something that a government that feels politically or militarily insecure would do.
-
Here’s where defense companies are funneling newfound tax dollars
If you listened to the annual earnings calls of the major, public defense companies (wait, does everyone not do that?), then you might have noticed a common theme. They’re all going to have more cash. And a lot of them have similar plans for how to spend it.
-
The US Nuclear Posture Review does not carry Trump’s signature
The Nuclear Posture Review neither proposes to leave the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty nor halt the testing moratorium. It did not propose a quantitative expansion of the nuclear arsenal either. Very un-Trump.
-
Putting the Asian fighter market in perspective
Regional tensions, historical grievances, superpower rivalries, and ongoing territorial and resource access disputes all motivate Asian air services to bolster their air power capabilities.
-
Inside DoD, the customer is speaking loudly
At its core, the dramatic increase in workarounds at DoD of the traditional acquisition process is a sure sign of growing customer unhappiness and frustration.
-
Nuclear Posture Review: Recognizing the return to great power competition
The recently-released Nuclear Posture Review reflects the central conclusion of the broader National Defense Strategy released in January: the U.S. must recognize the reality of a return to great power competition and posture itself accordingly.
-
Air mobility: A clear need for future environments
In any future environment, a robust mobility capability will be required; the versatility it offers as an instrument of national power is foundational to military, diplomatic and even economic success.
