-
Section 804 gives the US an advantage in great power competition with China and Russia
The U.S. Air Force is returning to its roots of designing, building and fielding cutting-edge systems using the same old-school mindset that put the Apollo astronauts on the moon.
-
Moving on from INF: Let’s harness the potential of the Missile Technology Control Regime
The tenure of INF is at its end. But MTCR should be vibrant for many years to come – so long as it can evolve to meet changing technologies and circumstances.
-
Hypersonic threats need an offense-defense mix
The counter-hypersonic mission has received surprisingly short shrift in recent defense budgets, with progress on hypersonic defense thus far piecemeal and halting.
-
A last chance for Turkey? There could still be time to fix the S-400 issue
The fundamental American concern about protecting F-35 technology is sound and is shared by other members of the international F-35 consortium.
-
In praise of the revolving door
A recent legislative proposal would damage the human capital of American defense, argues one reader.
-
Congress must fund engine helo tests to ensure the safety of our troops
When troops are sent into battle, the government needs to ensure they have the right equipment for the mission.
-
The US Air Force’s Next Generation Air Dominance program is key to mission success
America’s air-superiority capability is exceedingly fragile. Here’s what two readers say must be done.
-
Russia’s S-400: An offer US partners should refuse
Saudi Arabia, Qatar and India should carefully examine the case of Turkey and consider the costs and benefits of acquiring the S-400.
-
3 lessons for industry from the Defense News Top 100 list
Byron Callan of Capital Alpha Partners offers takeaways from the Top 100 for the defense industry.
-
America’s defense export strategy is key to deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region
American foreign military sales should align with the broader objective of deterring China without unnecessarily risking escalation or alienation of partners.
-
Section 804 gives the US an advantage in great power competition with China and Russia
The U.S. Air Force is returning to its roots of designing, building and fielding cutting-edge systems using the same old-school mindset that put the Apollo astronauts on the moon.
-
Moving on from INF: Let’s harness the potential of the Missile Technology Control Regime
The tenure of INF is at its end. But MTCR should be vibrant for many years to come – so long as it can evolve to meet changing technologies and circumstances.
-
Hypersonic threats need an offense-defense mix
The counter-hypersonic mission has received surprisingly short shrift in recent defense budgets, with progress on hypersonic defense thus far piecemeal and halting.
-
A last chance for Turkey? There could still be time to fix the S-400 issue
The fundamental American concern about protecting F-35 technology is sound and is shared by other members of the international F-35 consortium.
-
In praise of the revolving door
A recent legislative proposal would damage the human capital of American defense, argues one reader.
-
Congress must fund engine helo tests to ensure the safety of our troops
When troops are sent into battle, the government needs to ensure they have the right equipment for the mission.
-
The US Air Force’s Next Generation Air Dominance program is key to mission success
America’s air-superiority capability is exceedingly fragile. Here’s what two readers say must be done.
-
Russia’s S-400: An offer US partners should refuse
Saudi Arabia, Qatar and India should carefully examine the case of Turkey and consider the costs and benefits of acquiring the S-400.
-
3 lessons for industry from the Defense News Top 100 list
Byron Callan of Capital Alpha Partners offers takeaways from the Top 100 for the defense industry.
-
America’s defense export strategy is key to deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region
American foreign military sales should align with the broader objective of deterring China without unnecessarily risking escalation or alienation of partners.
-
Section 804 gives the US an advantage in great power competition with China and Russia
The U.S. Air Force is returning to its roots of designing, building and fielding cutting-edge systems using the same old-school mindset that put the Apollo astronauts on the moon.
-
Moving on from INF: Let’s harness the potential of the Missile Technology Control Regime
The tenure of INF is at its end. But MTCR should be vibrant for many years to come – so long as it can evolve to meet changing technologies and circumstances.
-
Hypersonic threats need an offense-defense mix
The counter-hypersonic mission has received surprisingly short shrift in recent defense budgets, with progress on hypersonic defense thus far piecemeal and halting.
-
A last chance for Turkey? There could still be time to fix the S-400 issue
The fundamental American concern about protecting F-35 technology is sound and is shared by other members of the international F-35 consortium.
-
In praise of the revolving door
A recent legislative proposal would damage the human capital of American defense, argues one reader.
-
Congress must fund engine helo tests to ensure the safety of our troops
When troops are sent into battle, the government needs to ensure they have the right equipment for the mission.
-
The US Air Force’s Next Generation Air Dominance program is key to mission success
America’s air-superiority capability is exceedingly fragile. Here’s what two readers say must be done.
-
Russia’s S-400: An offer US partners should refuse
Saudi Arabia, Qatar and India should carefully examine the case of Turkey and consider the costs and benefits of acquiring the S-400.
-
3 lessons for industry from the Defense News Top 100 list
Byron Callan of Capital Alpha Partners offers takeaways from the Top 100 for the defense industry.
-
America’s defense export strategy is key to deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region
American foreign military sales should align with the broader objective of deterring China without unnecessarily risking escalation or alienation of partners.
