'Make in India' Initiative Lacks Roadmap

NEW DELHI — While India's Narendra Modi government claims to have cleared new defense programs worth $30 billion aimed at boosting the domestic industry, companies since it came to power in May 2014, but it could still take more than 10 ten years to reach the contract stage because of lengthy procurement cycles and slow pace of decision-making.

Analysts and military officials welcome the "Make in India" concept policy move but private defense companies are apprehensive it reflects only a that this policy is still on paper policy and that there is no clear roadmap to laid which could help boost indigenous weapons production and in a bid to reduce dependence on imports.

The thrust of the "Make in India" policy is to reduce weapon imports from the current 70 percent of acquisition to about cut the level of weapons import from the current level of 70 percent to around 50 percent in the next 10 ten years as India plans to spend buy equipment buy weapons worth$150 billion on equipment in the next 15 years.

Given the delayed procurement process, It can take up to 10ten years for a defense program to achieve final approval. get finalized from the initial stage.

"Approvals are important as these pave the way for the tendering process to start but it is more important to ensure that the post-approval process does not get stymied at any of the subsequent stages in the procurement cycle, as has been happening so often," said Amit Cowshish, the Defence Ministry's Ministry of Defence (MoD's) former additional financial adviser.

"There is no dearth of cases in which the request for proposal (RFPs) gets retracted, and commencement of the contract negotiations is no guarantee that the contract is on the horizon," Cowshish added.

The mother of all defense deals, the Medium Multirole Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) program, which was abandoned after three years of negotiations, is a case in point, he said. says Cowshish.

Some analysts say the "Make in India" policy is misleading because currently there is no distinct category in the Defence Procurement Procedures (DPP) called for "Make in India." category.

The As of now only "Make in India category is meant for weapon projects to be manufactured by only domestic companies from the design to the development and production stages. Under this category, about 80 percent of the funding is provided by the MoD provides about 80 percent of the funding to develop high-tech system prototypes. So far, no not a single projects have been executed in this category.

Under the second category, is the Buy and Make (India), category under which tenders are given only to domestic companies that can then tie up with overseas companies able to transfer technology.

Appreciating the efforts of the current government efforts to promote in promoting the Make in India category, which has seen no confirmed order so far a senior MoD official said, "But Defense Minister [Manohar] Parrikar has made certain forward-looking changes to the Make procedure, such as according priority to the micro, small and medium enterprises, (MSMEs)- providing for up to 90 percent funding, enlarging the scope of Make projects and making the entire process more operationally viable."

A select panel set up by the MoD called the Aatre Committee recommended in January 2016 that to help boost the private sector defense companies serving as strategic partners (SPs) from the private sector should be selected to build large systems on nomination basis — a process currently used only for facility given by MoD only given to state-owned enterprises.

The MoD has yet to accept the recommendations and announce a separate policy on selection of private companies as strategic partners. as it is still unclear how a private company could be selected as SP.

Vivek Rae, MoD's former chief of defense procurement, said, "National champions need to be identified, nurtured and built over decades through a flow of orders on cost-plus basis wherever price discovery is not possible through competitive bidding. This is likely for complex systems like submarines, warships and aircraft. India has followed this approach for defense public sector undertakings (PSUs) but not for private sector."

The Hence PSUs order books are full while private sector languishes. The challenge, he said, is to develop strategic partners in the private sector.

Rae however says, "A national consensus should be created for this effort, cutting across party lines. Otherwise, allegations may fly thick and fast. Only companies with deep pockets and established credentials can qualify as strategic partners. Others will have to be satisfied as tier one or tier two vendors to strategic partners."

While Analysts and weapon users support self-reliance appreciate efforts to become self-reliant in weapons production but they remain skeptical about whether India would become a leading weapon producer s of weapons one day.

Giving reason for this skepticism, Rahul Bhonsle, retired Indian Army brigadier general, said, "There are two problems in this:  trust in government policies and investment. The private sector lacks trust in the government policies and are thus unwilling to investment unless there is clarity in the same.

"The way ahead for the government is to provide the seed money to selected private sector manufacturers with proven capabilities rather than floating requests for information ( RFI) to multiple vendors in the hope that competition will bring better outcomes," added Bhonsle said.