<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Defense News]]></title><link>https://www.defensenews.com</link><atom:link href="https://www.defensenews.com/arc/outboundfeeds/most-popular/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description><![CDATA[Defense News News Feed]]></description><lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate><language>en</language><ttl>1</ttl><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency><item><title><![CDATA[US service member killed in northern Iraq, US Central Command says ]]></title><link>https://www.defensenews.com/news/your-military/2026/07/19/us-service-member-killed-in-northern-iraq-us-central-command-says/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.defensenews.com/news/your-military/2026/07/19/us-service-member-killed-in-northern-iraq-us-central-command-says/</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Reuters, J.D. Simkins]]></dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A U.S. service member was killed on Saturday “during a controlled detonation of unexploded ordnance” in northern Iraq, CENTCOM confirmed.]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2026 20:33:04 +0000</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A U.S. service member was killed on Saturday “during a controlled detonation of unexploded ordnance” in northern Iraq, U.S. Central Command said.</p><p>The unexploded ordnance was from a “downed Iranian one-way attack drone,” Central Command said in a statement released Sunday.</p><p>The death of the U.S. service member in Iraq follows in the wake of two U.S. service members killed in action on Friday in an Iranian ballistic missile and drone attack on U.S. and partner forces in Jordan, U.S. Central Command <a href="https://x.com/centcom/status/2078530691109974522?s=46" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" title="https://x.com/centcom/status/2078530691109974522?s=46">announced</a>. </p><p>Four more troops had to be medically evacuated to hospitals in Jordan. </p><p>Those four service members have since been discharged, the command added. </p><p>“Other personnel who were evaluated for minor injuries have returned to duty,” the release stated. </p><p>U.S. Central Command originally noted that a third U.S. service member was missing, however, CENTCOM <a href="https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2078920477779890312?s=20" target="_blank" rel="" title="https://x.com/CENTCOM/status/2078920477779890312?s=20">announced today</a> that “After a thorough search, U.S. military personnel found unidentified remains at the location earlier today. An examination process to verify the remains is ongoing.”</p><p>U.S. Central Command is withholding the identities of the dead until 24 hours after the service members’ next of kin have been notified. </p><p>Additional information about the exact location of the attack had not been provided as of publication. </p><p>The latest casualties bring the toll of American troops killed in the war with Iran to 18. </p><p>Most recently, the commanding officer of the Navy’s Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 5, Cmdr. Gabriel Edwards, was killed on July 1 when the MH-60S Sea Hawk helicopter he was aboard went down in the Arabian Sea. Three other sailors were rescued following the emergency landing.</p><p>More than 400 U.S. troops have been wounded in the campaign, which began Feb. 28. </p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[2 US troops killed, 1 missing after Iranian missile, drone attack in Jordan]]></title><link>https://www.defensenews.com/flashpoints/2026/07/18/2-us-troops-killed-1-missing-after-iranian-missile-drone-attack-in-jordan/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.defensenews.com/flashpoints/2026/07/18/2-us-troops-killed-1-missing-after-iranian-missile-drone-attack-in-jordan/</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[J.D. Simkins]]></dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Two U.S. service members were killed in action on Friday in an Iranian ballistic missile and drone attack on U.S. and partner forces in Jordan.]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2026 18:00:58 +0000</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two U.S. service members were killed in action on Friday in an Iranian ballistic missile and drone attack on U.S. and partner forces in Jordan, U.S. Central Command <a href="https://x.com/centcom/status/2078530691109974522?s=46" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" title="https://x.com/centcom/status/2078530691109974522?s=46">announced</a>. </p><p>A third U.S. service member is missing, the command release added, while four more troops had to be medically evacuated to hospitals in Jordan. </p><p>Those four service members have since been discharged, the command added. </p><p>“Other personnel who were evaluated for minor injuries have returned to duty,” the release stated. </p><p>U.S. Central Command is withholding the identities of the dead until 24 hours after the service members’ next of kin have been notified. </p><p>Additional information about the exact location of the attack had not been provided as of publication. </p><p>The casualties in Friday’s attack bring the toll of American troops killed in the war with Iran to 16. </p><p>Most recently, the commanding officer of the Navy’s Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 5, Cmdr. Gabriel Edwards, was killed on July 1 when the MH-60S Sea Hawk helicopter he was aboard went down in the Arabian Sea. Three other sailors were rescued following the emergency landing.</p><p>More than 400 U.S. troops have been wounded in the campaign, which began Feb. 28. </p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[US Navy 2 years behind on hypersonic missile installation on Zumwalt destroyers]]></title><link>https://www.defensenews.com/industry/techwatch/2026/07/17/us-navy-2-years-behind-on-hypersonic-missile-installation-on-zumwalt-destroyers/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.defensenews.com/industry/techwatch/2026/07/17/us-navy-2-years-behind-on-hypersonic-missile-installation-on-zumwalt-destroyers/</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Peck]]></dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The U.S. Navy’s expensive effort to install hypersonic missiles on three Zumwalt-class destroyers is two years behind schedule.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:45:15 +0000</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2026/07/17/navy-instructs-commands-to-remove-portraits-biographies-from-websites/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" title="https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2026/07/17/navy-instructs-commands-to-remove-portraits-biographies-from-websites/">U.S. Navy’s</a> expensive effort to install hypersonic missiles on three Zumwalt-class destroyers is two years behind schedule, according to government auditors. </p><p>In addition to problems stemming from both the destroyers and the missiles, the <a href="https://www.navytimes.com/industry/techwatch/2026/07/17/saronic-picks-brownsville-texas-for-3-billion-port-alpha-shipyard/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" title="https://www.navytimes.com/industry/techwatch/2026/07/17/saronic-picks-brownsville-texas-for-3-billion-port-alpha-shipyard/">Navy</a> and <a href="https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2026/07/17/dc-national-guard-gets-its-first-security-vessel/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" title="https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2026/07/17/dc-national-guard-gets-its-first-security-vessel/">Army</a> are reportedly not coordinating work on the joint Conventional Prompt Strike missile program. Missile flight testing scheduled for 2025 has been pushed back to 2027. </p><p>“Despite recent successes testing the CPS missile, the Navy faces several programmatic challenges associated with developing, delivering, and deploying the CPS missile on the DDG-1000,” warned the Government Accountability Office <a href="https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-26-107974" target="_blank" rel=""><u>report</u></a>. “These challenges include rising costs, schedule delays, reliability issues with DDG-1000 class destroyers, and CPS production challenges, among other things.” </p><p>In search of a mission for the DDG-1000 after escalating costs and capability concerns resulted in the program being cut from 32 ships to just three, the Navy decided in 2022 to arm the Zumwalts with CPS <a href="https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2022/navy/2022cps.pdf" target="_blank" rel=""><u>boost-glide</u></a> hypersonic missiles. CPS uses a two-stage booster to loft a high-altitude glider that can hit a target thousands of miles away in 30 minutes or less. </p><p>Two Zumwalts have been delivered, and the third is scheduled for 2028. In addition, CPS missiles will arm Virginia-class attack submarines, while the Army uses a land-based version called the <a href="https://www.dote.osd.mil/Portals/97/pub/reports/FY2023/army/2023lrhw.pdf?ver=jClghaowEkarGt-qUGMXNg%3D%3D" target="_blank" rel=""><u>Land-Range Hypersonic Weapon</u></a>. </p><p>However, modifications to the destroyers — such as installing hypersonic missiles and vertical launch tubes — has added costs and delays. </p><p>One ship, for example, needed “more cabling than was anticipated in the initial project design, as the contractor cut and removed more cabling than planned from the forward part of the ship for CPS missile launch tube installation,” GAO noted. </p><p>In addition, “the DDG-1000 class ships have unique systems, such as its radar, combat, and network systems, that are costly and difficult to sustain and maintain,” GAO said. </p><p>The Zumwalts suffer from unreliable power systems and difficulty in obtaining spare parts. </p><p>Despite some <a href="https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4172652/us-navy-proves-sea-based-hypersonic-launch-approach/" target="_blank" rel=""><u>successful</u></a> flight tests from land facilities, the CPS missile has also run into problems. </p><p>The cost of the missiles has risen sharply: a 2020 Navy estimate of $31 billion for 262 missiles has mushroomed into $41 billion for 224 missiles. </p><p>“Lockheed Martin, the CPS missile body prime contractor responsible for production integration, faces significant production issues that it must address to build the missiles at anticipated rates and costs,” said GAO. </p><p>There have been problems with heat-resistant coatings, substandard parts and insufficient production capacity, with the factory only capable of producing six or seven missiles a year instead of the desired 12. </p><p>Building the CPS missile has also proved too complex for some workers. </p><p>“According to Navy and Army program officials, the work instructions are largely written as engineering specifications, which the contractor provides to workers who have recently graduated from high school or vocational school,” the GAO report noted. “Navy production oversight officials said that it is unreasonable to expect workers to understand the instructions provided.” </p><p>In theory, the Army should have an easier time with its LRHW missile, which mainly differs from CPS in the launcher. Rather than the cold-gas ejection system that pops CPS from a tube before ignition, LRHW uses a hot-launch system. </p><p>However, GAO pointed out a concerning lack of coordination between the two services. For example, while the Navy is responsible for production of the missile body, the Army used its own consultant to study how to increase production. </p><p>Thus, “the Navy cannot make decisions in isolation since the Army is buying its own missiles and manages key aspects of production,” the report concluded. Without a joint development and procurement strategy, “the Navy and the Army create the potential for both additional delay and inefficient use of taxpayer funds.” </p>]]></content:encoded></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is there a path forward for the Take Care of America’s Veterans Act?]]></title><link>https://www.defensenews.com/video/2026/07/17/is-there-a-path-forward-for-the-take-care-of-americas-veterans-act/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.defensenews.com/video/2026/07/17/is-there-a-path-forward-for-the-take-care-of-americas-veterans-act/</guid><description><![CDATA[Rep. Mark Takano, ranking member of the House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, weighs in on new legislation to change the face of some veteran benefits.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 19:35:27 +0000</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Saronic picks Brownsville, Texas, for $3 billion Port Alpha shipyard]]></title><link>https://www.defensenews.com/industry/techwatch/2026/07/17/saronic-picks-brownsville-texas-for-3-billion-port-alpha-shipyard/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.defensenews.com/industry/techwatch/2026/07/17/saronic-picks-brownsville-texas-for-3-billion-port-alpha-shipyard/</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Scanlon]]></dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Autonomous vessel maker Saronic is set to build Port Alpha, a shipyard the company describes as the most advanced in the world, in Texas.]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 18:49:07 +0000</pubDate><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Autonomous vessel maker Saronic is set to build Port Alpha, a shipyard the company describes as the most advanced in the world, at the Port of Brownsville, Texas.</p><p><a href="https://www.prnewswire.com/apac/news-releases/saronic-to-build-port-alpha-americas-next-generation-shipyard-in-brownsville-texas-302827970.html" target="_blank" rel="">The announcement</a> builds on an eventful few weeks for the company’s Corsair drone boats.</p><p>On July 12, three Corsairs <a href="https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2026/07/13/sea-drones-strike-iranian-port-in-combat-first-for-us-navy/" target="_blank" rel="">struck Iran’s Bandar Abbas naval base</a> in what U.S. Central Command called the first combat use of unmanned surface vessels by American forces. </p><p>Weeks earlier, a Navy-operated Corsair helped <a href="https://www.militarytimes.com/news/your-military/2026/06/09/us-soldiers-rescued-after-apache-helicopter-goes-down-near-the-coast-of-oman/" target="_blank" rel="">rescue two soldiers</a> after their Army AH-64 Apache went down near the Strait of Hormuz, a mission Central Command called another first of its kind by an unmanned surface vessel.</p><p>Founded in 2022, Saronic first <a href="https://www.defensenews.com/naval/2025/02/18/saronic-unveils-plans-for-autonomous-shipyard/" target="_blank" rel="">unveiled plans for Port Alpha</a> in February 2025 but stopped short of naming a site or a cost. Plans now include an initial 835-acre site in Cameron County, with room to grow to nearly 4,400 acres. It’s an investment the company puts at more than $3 billion. The site was chosen over competing sites in California and Virginia, among others.</p><p>Construction is set to break ground this year, with the yard expected to open in 2028. Initially, the facility will be capable of building vessels up to 850 feet, about the length of a U.S. Navy Wasp-class amphibious assault ship, though future expansion could support vessels longer than 1,200 feet, the company said.</p><p>Saronic estimates Port Alpha could create up to 10,000 direct jobs over the next decade, from welding and machining to robotics, software engineering and naval architecture. The company also projects $264.5 billion in economic impact for Texas and $160 billion for Cameron County.</p><p>Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, who announced the project from Saronic’s Austin headquarters, said a fully built-out yard would deliver about $750 million a year in wages, a sum he called “game-changing for the population of Texas.” </p><p>To help land the project, the state extended an $80 million grant from the Texas Enterprise Fund, <a href="https://gov.texas.gov/es/news/post/saronicbrownsville" target="_blank" rel="">according to the governor’s office</a>.</p><p>Last month, Cameron County commissioners approved a 95% tax abatement for the project over roughly two decades, <a href="https://news.usni.org/2026/07/16/saronic-announces-texas-site-for-new-3-2b-shipyard" target="_blank" rel="">according to USNI News</a>. The agreement is contingent on Saronic filling 35% of the yard’s jobs with local residents, and the tax break shrinks if the company misses its local hiring targets, <a href="https://www.texastribune.org/2026/06/18/tax-abatement-saronic-brownsville-texas/" target="_blank" rel="">the Texas Tribune reported</a>.</p><p>The deal was not without local opposition. According to <a href="https://www.theborderchronicle.com/who-pays-for-brownsvilles-industrial-and-tech-boom/" target="_blank" rel="">the Border Chronicle</a>, at least 40 people testified or submitted written statements against the abatement, some questioning why a company valued at $9.25 billion needed a tax break. The June 16 vote passed only after two earlier delays and hours of testimony.</p><p>Port Alpha would become Saronic’s third site. It runs a plant in central Texas that turns out the 24-foot Corsair, for which the Navy awarded a <a href="https://www.workboat.com/saronic-awarded-392-million-navy-contract" target="_blank" rel="">$392 million production contract</a> in December, and last year it bought a former Gulf Craft yard in Franklin, Louisiana, where it is spending $300 million to build the larger, 180-foot Marauder. </p><p>Dino Mavrookas, Saronic’s co-founder and chief executive, did not specify which ships Port Alpha would build but told reporters the company envisions autonomy playing a role in larger hulls over time, <a href="https://news.usni.org/2026/07/16/saronic-announces-texas-site-for-new-3-2b-shipyard" target="_blank" rel="">according to USNI News</a>.</p><p>“Those ships might not be fully autonomous or fully unmanned on day one,” he said. “But over time, as we look at building out the tech and building out the industry as a whole, there’s no reason that you can’t unman those ships completely.”</p><p>Port Alpha arrives amid a federal push to rebuild a U.S. shipbuilding base that has fallen far behind China’s. Saronic tied the project to <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/04/15/2025-06465/restoring-americas-maritime-dominance" target="_blank" rel="">an executive order on maritime dominance</a> that President Donald Trump issued in April 2025, along with the SHIPS for America Act and a federal Maritime Action Plan, all aimed at reversing decades of decline in commercial and naval ship production.</p><p>“America’s maritime future depends on our ability to build again,” said Mavrookas, adding that the yard was built “to deliver ships at a speed and scale not seen since World War II.”</p><p>Saronic is <a href="https://www.defensenews.com/news/your-navy/2026/06/02/us-navy-selects-companies-for-at-sea-musv-prototype-testing/" target="_blank" rel="">one of seven companies</a> competing for the Navy’s medium unmanned surface vessel contract, with at-sea testing set to run through October.</p><p>The company said it will work with Texas, Cameron County and local schools to build training and apprenticeship programs for the yard, but did not say when it expects to name customers or specific ship classes for Port Alpha.</p>]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>