In a major shake-up of the U.S.-led combat mission in Afghanistan, up to eight newly designed units - dubbed security force assistance brigades (SFABs) - will replace an equal number of U.S. Army brigade combat teams (BCTs) across the east and south of the country by next spring, bringing a new focus to the training and advising mission while pushing Afghans to take the lead in security operations. (U.S. Army)
In a major shake-up of the American-led combat mission in Afghanistan, up to eight newly designed units — dubbed security force assistance brigades (SFABs) — will replace an equal number of Army brigade combat teams (BCTs) across the east and south of the country by next spring, bringing a new focus to the training and advising mission while pushing Afghans to take the lead in security operations.
Not only will the SFABs focus more on training and mentoring Afghan National Security Forces than leading combat and counterinsurgency missions, but they will also deploy at about half the strength of the BCTs they’re replacing. Each SFAB is 1,400 to 2,000 soldiers, as opposed to the 3,500 to 4,000 soldiers in a fully manned brigade.
The first SFAB to deploy is the 4th BCT, 1st Cavalry Division. About 1,400 soldiers left in November for a nine-month tour in Regional Command-East. The 1st BCT, 101st Airborne Division, is deploying about 1,900 troops, and 2nd BCT, 10th Mountain Division, will deploy early next year with fewer than half of its 3,500 soldiers.
The move has major implications for the overall mission in Afghanistan, as the number of U.S. forces will likely decline as smaller brigades take the place of their larger predecessors, and Afghan forces take the lead in planning and executing operations. There are 68,000 U.S. service members in country; roughly 40,000 of those are soldiers.
Pentagon and Army officials stress that no final decision has been made on the size of the U.S. contingent in Afghanistan in the run up to the White House-imposed December 2014 conclusion of combat operations, but Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno told Defense News on Nov. 20 that “I expect over the next month that some decisions will be made. The first decision that has to be made is what are we going to leave behind after 2014. I believe that that decision will be made after the first of the year, but we haven’t even started intense discussions on it yet.”
At their core, SFABs will be made up of a number of security force assistance teams of 10 to 20 officers and noncommissioned officers each, who will rely on the remainder of the brigade for their security, logistics, intelligence and joint fires needs.
While individual teams have deployed throughout 2012 to mentor Afghan forces, they have been forced to rely on whichever brigade owned the battlespace for security, transportation, intelligence and logistics. This added to the brigade’s workload and at times caused friction between the teams and the host brigade since the team’s goals didn’t always align with those of the brigade commander.
The problem was that the two groups had not worked together prior to deployment. The small size of the teams also put them at risk of green-on-blue attacks since they weren’t large enough to provide for their own security.
The new model gives these teams their own security, joint fires, intel, and logistics capabilities so they can function independently.
“Although they won’t take the whole brigade,” Odierno said, “this will allow us to take the soldiers and leaders [needed for training], and who will also provide security for those teams. It integrates them into unity of command and unity of effort. It’s something similar to the brigades that we established there at the end in Iraq. So I think this is the right way to go.”
The deployments mark a major shift in the way the Afghanistan fight is being waged, said U.S. Army Col. Randy Lane, chief of campaign plans at International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) headquarters in Afghanistan.
“Arguably, the most important thing we have to do now is not the fighting, but instead enabling the Afghans to secure themselves,” Lane said, “and we think that this is the best way forward.”
ISAF has 387 training teams in country and will have 400 by the end of December.
In a mark of how deeply this new concept is felt, Lane turned the motto of NATO Training Mission-Afghanistan on its head, saying that 2013 “is all about us getting out of the shoulder-to-shoulder mentality and conducting combined operations, to getting the [Afghan forces] leading all of the operations while we conduct the training, advising and assisting.”
Since 2009, the training command has used the Dari phrase “Shohna ba Shohna,” meaning “shoulder to shoulder,” to describe the joint combat operations NATO troops were conducting with Afghan forces.
By next December, a year into the SFAB model and a year away from the end of combat, ISAF leadership expects to see the Afghans operating independently, with some advisers continuing to work closely with some brigades. The Afghans “will be out there and really conducting all the operations from police all the way up to [counterinsurgency] operations, and leading this all the way into the presidential elections in April 2014,” Lane said.
The SFAB concept also paves the way for an enduring training mission that will last beyond the December 2014 drawdown date originally outlined by U.S. President Barack Obama. Over the past year, the 2014 date has been transformed, with little public debate, away from what was initially considered the end of U.S. involvement in fighting the Taliban to the beginning of what is merely a smaller footprint for U.S. forces in Afghanistan.
In comments during a swing through Asia on Nov. 12, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told reporters outgoing ISAF chief Marine Corps Gen. John Allen is working on plans to identify the right number of troops to stay behind for “the post-2014 enduring presence,” which would include missions such as counterterrorism, training, advising and assisting the Afghan Army and police.
But while ground forces may be drawing down, the U.S. can still maintain a strong presence in the skies. Withdrawing from Afghanistan is “going to require a pretty intensive air effort while the drawdown goes on, and then for some time afterward,” said Rebecca Grant, president of the IRIS research group.
Grant said “at least half” of the air forces in Afghanistan will be withdrawn, but the U.S. will likely maintain some ISR and air-drop capabilities. She also points out that the improved landing strips around the country mean it would be fairly easy for coalition air forces to surge back into Afghanistan if needed.
“I do not see this being a complete drawdown of the air component, by any stretch of the imagination,” Grant said. But ultimately what form it takes will rely on the situation on the ground.
Even before major withdrawal efforts are underway, the Defense Department has significantly increased the use of unmanned vehicles in operations. The number of UAV strikes in Afghanistan has gone up every year under the Obama administration, according to Air Force statistics. Since the start of 2009, there have been 1,160 strikes in Afghanistan, rising from 255 strikes in 2009, to 333 through Oct. 31.
Aaron Mehta contributed to this report.